collection of countries. Though the raised attitude of� equity creates a positive image that,

to some extent, we are all endowed with treasurous resources. However such natural

assets are not allocated� equally and aversely it is exhaustible. Some regions own million

barrels of mineral underneath while some count on their arid land. Whose false was that

to settle down in unpromising land ?� The answer is no one's. The world is simply like

that; it is naturally unfair.� There are some condolences stated that though you are

deprived of physical assets, you get the spiritual ones instead. In this material world, quite

often that the phrase is not applicable. Some families may consent with what they have

though the properties are seldom quench their basic needs. They are the minority of the

world. When the problem of� poverty deals greatly with individual expectations , equity is

measured by objective standards intertwined with surrounding societal share. A pauper

may feel he is as rich as a prince but he has never be regarded as equal.

�

��������� When the world by nature is injustice, the obligations fall to its dwellers to equate

the assets in a proper manner within their generation and beyond. For intrageneration

aspect, the terms poor countries, rich countries were used quite often. Inequity presents in

both groups however symptoms are more severe in the poor ones.

�

��������� In third world where agricultural societies predominate, holdings of land are very

small in size among the farmers and the left are alloted within few per cent of the

population, who loan their land with high interest, thus deteriorating financial situation of

major farmers reducing their chances of better lives and equity in resources. Also many of

the land are marginal, but they are the only asset the farmers have unless they have to

appropriate the land in national park for temporary farming which also widely happened

in the out back. Urbanization clusters only in a few city normally the capital city of the

country or region. Out of these boundaries, less are distributed in terms of infrastructures,

health care, education, communication and so on

�

��������� In Urban society, though major infrastructures are provided, the accessibility is,

rationally, not. In rich suburbs, facilities are self- contained though rich people can

acquire those by themselves where in contrast, poor suburbs have less to share while

they need government to lean on. The lack of infrastructure inhibits the productive

capacity of people, and reduces access to basic services of health, education and the

public distribution system. This burden is�� disproportionately borne by the poor, who

cannot afford the private alternatives, if they exist at all. Quite often that the unjust

distribution is based on political reason. There are strategies of population; poor folks

stuck with sub-world-class societies and small circles of poor friends. They get less

educated and lose opportunity in gainful careers. The life circle paces like that.�

Sometimes scholarships are granted to poor children to cut the circle but if they take the

chance, they cannot work to feed the other lives in the family. Moreover the subsidies are

significantly limited and often stressed on the academically promising students. When

there is no food in the stomachs, no medication for their illness and eight hours a day are

devoted to toil job just to sustain daily needs, how come a poor student make promising

performance and thus the scholarships� are awarded to other students whose

circumstances are more suitable to study, often the better off students. Many educational

or professional institutions per se have status barrier for financial background. The world

wide communication itself, though promoted as the common education accessible

equally throughout the world, is the present of unfair tradition when two-thirds of the

world's population has never made a telephone call, let alone accessed the Internet. The

situations can be worse in the countries where social status is stringent such as India.

Women right� is obliterated and the lowest social status is treated with a totally unequal

manner. Not only can these people not be part of fair social participation, but they are not

permitted to be near when the proceedings are underway to boot. Not every citizen in

poor countries is poor, while millions are starving of the famine, some people in the cities

celebrate their holiday . When people in up country have to walk for ten miles to clean

water for food, people in city drive their fancy� cars to the nearby swimming pool. Many of

the poor countries are not poor of resources , but equity.